The host hit the nail on the head when he said Bell is asking for it both ways. It seems his beliefs/implications change depending on whether or not the person he's talking to agrees with him. In this case he was challenged so he played innocent, whereas in his book he suggests that we have a distorted view of what hell really is and that everybody will eventually be saved.
By the way, you should check out this review on his book:
Comments
Have a great day.
By the way, you should check out this review on his book:
http://www.challies.com/book-reviews/love-wins-a-review-of-rob-bells-new-book#more